PVTA Fleet Focus - Part 2: New Flyers, Proterras, and more!
Picking up from where I Ieft off
from Part 1, in this post I’ll be looking the vehicles the PVTA ordered
post-2010, which includes buses made by New Flyer and Proterra. The shuttle
buses and RTS’ of the fleet will also be included in this.
New Flyer XD40
Sleek
and Sophisticated
|
Fleet
Number
|
Year
|
Operator
|
Engine
|
Transmission
|
1810
- 1819
|
2011
|
SATCo
|
Cummins ISL9
|
Allison B400R
|
7801
- 7802
|
VATCo
|
|||
1821
- 1826
|
2012
|
SATCo
|
||
7811
- 7815
|
VATCo
|
|||
1830
- 1837
|
2014
|
SATCo
|
||
1840
- 1849
|
2015
|
For this set of reviews, I’ll order things a little bit differently and start off the with the New Flyer XD40’s. These are the standard 40-foot transit buses of the New Flyer Xcelsior line. The PVTA started receiving these back in 2011, and they were introduced with the current paint scheme which I call the “Xcelsior Arcs”. The XD40’s gradually replaced the remaining RTS High Floors in the fleet up until they were relegated to UMass Transit’s charter buses in 2016. Now, the XD40’s work alongside the Gillig Low Floor 40’ buses, providing service to the majority of fixed routes.
Where they can be found
In the Springfield area, these buses can be found on pretty much every route, but they’re more often run on core and high-ridership routes. The XD40’s based in Northampton are almost always used on the B43 and B48.
My opinion of them
Rating: 7/10
I gave these a decent rating, but I have some grievances to air about the PVTA’s Xcelsior buses. Starting off with what’s good about them, I love the interior design of the Xcelsiors. It’s modern and feels comfortable, and it’s nice that the Xcelsiors don’t rattle as much as the Gilligs.
Now onto what I don’t like:
1. The windows. For the Xcelsiors, the PVTA decided to go with frameless windows that don’t open, which makes the bus look sleek from the outside, but not so much on the inside. These windows feel plasticky and flimsy, and they get permanently faded and dirty over time.
2. Hot Xcelsiors! There have been countless times when I’m riding an Xcelsior and its hot and stuffy inside, especially on a packed G1, B43, or campus shuttle in the winter. On Gilligs, this can be relieved by opening windows, but there is no such option for the New Flyers. The worst case I’ve experienced was the one time the air-conditioning of an Xcelsior wasn’t working well, and that was by far the hottest bus I’ve ever been on.
3. Leaky roof. The Xcelsiors have roofs that tend to leak, particularly at the rear of the bus and around the roof vent. On rainy days, when riding Gilligs I only have to worry about water pooling at the bottom of windows, but on Xcelsiors I have to worry about water dripping from above!
These problems are not unique to the XD40’s. Any bus in the Xcelsior line can have these issues. The Xcelsiors win over the Gilligs in terms of looks, but both have their share of issues.
New Flyer XD35
The
little Xcelsior that could
|
Fleet
Number
|
Year
|
Operator
|
Engine
|
Transmission
|
1701
|
2011
|
SATCo
|
Cummins ISL9
|
Allison B400R
|
3306
- 3310
|
UMTS
|
|||
3311
- 3315
|
2014
|
|||
1710
- 1714
|
2015
|
SATCo
|
||
1715
- 1716
|
2020
|
These 35-foot buses are the
smallest in the New Flyer Xcelsior line and can be directly compared to the
Gillig Low Floor 35’s.
Where they can be found
In the Springfield area, these
buses can be found on pretty much the same routes at the Gillig Low Floor 35’
buses, meaning the radial routes, town connectors, and crosstown routes. The
New Flyer XD35’s based with UMass Transit are almost always used on the UMass
Campus Shuttles, but they also appear on Routes 36 and 39.
My opinion of them
Rating: 7/10
Because these are the smallest
of the Xcelsior buses, I view them the same way I view the Gillig Low Floor 29’
buses; they’re tiny but also have the power of their larger counterparts.
New Flyer XDE40
The
Hybrids
|
Fleet
#
|
Year
|
Operator
|
Engine
|
Transmission
|
1801
- 1805
|
2011
|
SATCo
|
Cummins ISB6.7
|
BAE Systems HybriDrive
|
3301
- 3305
|
UMTS
|
|||
3316
- 3319
|
2020
|
The XDE40’s are the
hybrid-electric versions of the Xcelsior 40-foot bus. These buses are better
for the environment because they produce less emissions and are more fuel
efficient than standard diesel buses. What distinguishes the XDE40’s from the
XD40’s is an electric motor running in parallel with the diesel engine, the
transmission, and the “⚡
HYBRID
– ELECTRIC POWERED ⚡” decals
on the side of the bus.
Where they can be found
In the Springfield-area, they
can be found on core routes just like the XD40. UMass Transit’s XDE40’s can be
found on all of Amherst’s routes, excluding the campus shuttles.
My opinion of them
Rating: 7.5/10
The diesel-electric power
makes for smoother rides and the sound of the electric motor reminds me of the battery-electric
Proterras in the fleet. In my opinion, the XDE40’s are a bit more appealing
than the XD40’s. I wonder why the PVTA didn’t go with more hybrid-electric
Xcelsiors.
Fleet
#
|
Year
|
Operator
|
Engine
|
Transmission
|
3401
- 3402
|
2013
|
UMTS
|
Cummins ISL9
|
Allison H 50 EP
|
7901
- 7902
|
VATCo
|
These 60-foot articulated
buses are the largest in the Xcelsior line and the largest buses in the PVTA
fleet. The PVTA put these million-dollar buses in service in 2013 to address
the serious overcrowding issues on some routes in Amherst and Northampton. Even
though they rest in the summer (aside from training), these buses are workhorses
too, transporting passengers and party crowds well into the early morning
hours. Just like the XDE40’s of the fleet, these buses are hybrid-electric.
Where they can be found
The XDE60’s are exclusively
found on Routes 30, 31, and the B43 during college semesters. These routes have
the most overcrowding issues due to the large number of students from the area’s
colleges. Because there’s only four XDE60 buses in the fleet, standard 40-foot
buses run on these routes too. The Springfield area will get articulated buses
one day too, once the PVTA has the capital to acquire them. They’ll likely be
placed on Springfield’s highest-ridership routes like the B7 and G1.
My opinion of them
Rating: 10/10
The XDE60’s are easily some of
my favorite buses in the fleet. After all, who doesn’t like a bendy bus? They’re
so good that I really don’t have much to say about them that isn’t obvious.
Proterra Catalyst FC (BE40)
Fleet
#
|
Year
|
Operator
|
Engine
|
Transmission
|
1410
- 1412
|
2016
|
SATCo
|
UQM
HD220 Electric Motor
|
Eaton
EEV-7202
|
The Proterra Catalysts are the
PVTA’s newish battery-electric buses. Three of these zero-emission buses
were introduced to the fleet in 2016 as a pilot for the PVTA’s use of electric
buses. The Proterra Catalysts have a unique curvy design that makes them stand
out, and the PVTA put a special black and white livery on them, complete with
lightning bolts and “ELECTRIC BUS” in a futuristic font. These buses look
straight from the future and they are the future; a general statewide goal is to have all buses sold in Massachusetts
be electric powered by 2040. How achievable that goal is at the current rate is questionable, but its nice to see an initiative for cleaner transportation.
Where they can be found
The Proterra Catalysts are
exclusively used on the P21E and the Downtown Springfield LOOP (1411, the bus
used on the LOOP has its own livery featuring Springfield attractions).
Occasionally, they also end up on Springfield school Trippers. The PVTA has
ordered eight more Proterra buses, and they will be used on more routes once
they are put into service. SATCo has the only garage that can accommodate
electric buses, so the Proterras will only remain on Springfield area routes
for the time being.
My opinion of them
Rating: 9/10
In terms of my fleet favorites,
the Proterra Catalysts are right up there with the XDE60’s. These buses offer a
quiet, smooth, and an environmentally pleasing ride compared to a standard
diesel bus. Plus, the PVTA has done an excellent job making these buses look
nice inside and out. My only complaints about the Proterras is that they don’t
always operate perfectly. The bus or station chargers have issues from time to
time. Also, when coming from a stop, these buses have a quick and jerky acceleration,
which can make for an unpleasant experience if you’re standing. In general, the
pros about the Proterra easily outweigh the occasional bad experience, and I
can’t wait for more of them to hit the streets.
Shuttle and Cutaway Buses
This list only includes shuttle
buses used on fixed routes, and not the van service fleet. Information I’m not sure about is marked with
a “?”
Fleet
#
|
Type
|
Year
|
Operator
|
1204
- 1207
|
CEQ Phoenix Type D
|
2015
|
HTS
/ VATCo
|
1208
- 1209
|
2018
|
HTS
|
|
5707
|
CEQ
Phoenix Type E
|
2017
|
NEXT?
|
5574
|
Starcraft
ST2910C
|
2011?
|
VATCo?
|
I didn’t see a point in giving
each shuttle model its own review, so I’ve just lumped them all into one. These
vehicles are used on the PVTA’s short list of “shuttle routes”. They’re
essentially the standard paratransit and dial-a-ride vans modified for route
service. Some of them have features of full-size buses like destination signs,
a farebox, and bike racks. Others have none or only some of those features.
All of them have an ADA lift at the rear.
Where they can be found
These buses are only found on
PVTA’s shuttle routes, which include the 39E, the Nashawannuck Express, the NSC Shuttle, the Ware/Palmer Express & Circulators, and the Wilbraham Shuttle.
You will never find a full-size bus operating on these routes (except the 39E),
and you will never find a shuttle bus operating on any other route.
My opinion of them
Rating: 2/10
Boy, do I dislike the shuttles.
Yes, they have their place and purpose of serving communities and destinations
where full-sized buses are not needed, but the novelty of riding them wears off
quickly, and they become an annoyance. The most irritating thing about them is
the grating sound of the ADA lift rattling away the whole ride.
Nova Bus RTS’
I have a confession to make.
I’ve never ridden an RTS bus… I only really started becoming interested in
transit just after the RTS’ were retired from fixed-route service in
2016. Apparently, UMass Transit’s last ones are awaiting to be parted out. If
there’s any way I can get up close and inside one (when it’s safe to do so),
I’d love to know.
And that concludes my review
of every bus model in the fleet. Writing these was a lot of fun, as well as
hearing from others and their opinions about certain buses.
As the PVTA's oldest Gilligs begin to reach their recommended lifespan, we will see the replacement of these as well as
the further integration of electric buses, so the development of the fleet
will sure be interesting in the coming years. I’ll keep the information in these
posts updated, and I’ll discuss fleet developments in new posts when they arise.
Detailed
fleet information was found from the CPTDB wiki, PVTA’s Transit Asset Management Plan, and personal experience.